Local structures and orientations of guest molecules in kaolinite intercalation compounds of kaolinite/formamide (FA), kaolinite/formamide- N, N - d 2 (FA- d 2 ), kaolinite/ N -methylformamide (NMF), and kaolinite/ N, N -dimethylformamide (DMF) have been studied by means of solid-state NMR. 29 Si magic-angle-spinning (MAS) NMR spectra identify the original kaolinite and the intercalates, while 13 C MAS NMR spectra distinguish interlayer and outersurface adsorbed guest molecules. Quantitative analyses of 29 Si and 13 C NMR spectra combined with thermogravimetric analysis result in a formula of one interlayer guest molecule per Al 2 Si 2 O 5 (OH) 4 host unit for all the intercalates. Intercalation causes high-frequency shift in the 13 C resonance of the guest molecules. Strength in the guest−host interaction as revealed by changes in the 13 C chemical shift of the carbonyl group upon intercalation is in the order of FA > NMF ∼ DMF. The 13 C chemical shift of the methyl group confirms a cis conformation for NMF in the kaolinite interlayer space, and changes in the methyl chemical shift upon intercalation are DMF (trans) > NMF (cis) > DMF (cis). The magnitude of the temperature dependence in the 13 C chemical shift is on the order of FA < NMF < DMF, and the 13 C line width is FA > NMF > DMF. These facts reveal that the mobility of the guest molecules is in the order of FA < NMF < DMF. Kaolinite/NMF shows a second methyl peak whose amount increases with decreasing temperature, demonstrating the presence of molecules with a different orientation. The 1 H chemical shifts confirm hydrogen-bonding interactions between the amide protons and the kaolinite host in kaolinite/FA and no such hydrogen-bonding interactions in kaolinite/NMF at room temperature. The chemical shift value of the hydroxyl groups in the host kaolinite structure is not affected by intercalation. The 1 H line widths of carbonyls are FA > NMF > DMF, and those of methyls are NMF > DMF, which confirms again that the mobility of the guest molecules is FA < NMF < DMF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xie et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: