The time course of GH secretion in response to hpGRF and its dependency on the extracellular Ca2+ concentration were studied in perifused dispersed anterior pituitary cells. The onset of GH secretion in response to 1 nM hpGRF was relatively rapid (within 5 s) but removal of hpGRF after 10-min application further increased the rate of secretion (off-response). The threshold and maximum concentrations of hpGRF in stimulatory secretion were 10(-12) and 10(-8) M respectively. Between these two concentrations, the responses showed dose dependency. A reduction in the extracellular Ca2+ concentration to 0.25 mM or to nominally zero reduced hpGRF-induced GH secretion to 64.4% or to 1.9%, respectively, of the control response in the presence of 2.5 mM Ca2+. Two mM Co2+, known as a strong calcium channel blocker, completely suppressed hpGRF-induced GH secretion. The removal of Ca2+ from the perifusion buffer immediately after the offset of 1 min-applied 1 nM hpGRF accelerated the falling phase of GH secretion, which is parallel to the decline in [Ca2+]o in the perifusion chamber. Under nominal Ca2+-free conditions, hpGRF produced no increase in GH secretion. However, 10 min after the offset of 1 min-applied hpGRF under Ca2+-free conditions, the introduction of normal buffer containing 2.5 mM Ca2+ substantially restored GH secretion, although after 20 min the introduction of normal buffer produced only a slight increase in GH secretion. In perifusion experiment of 10(6) cells, intracellular cyclic AMP (cAMP) content was raised from the basal value of 4 to 26 pmol by 2-min application of 1 nM hpGRF. After cessation of hpGRF application, cAMP content decreased to 8.7 pmol at 11 min and returned to the basal value by 20 min. The same tendency was observed in Ca2+-free buffer. In conclusion, the extracellular Ca2+ was essential for hpGRF-induced GH secretion. This indicates the importance of the influx of Ca2+ in response to hpGRF. The time course of hpGRF-induced rise and fall in cAMP content was roughly parallel to the GH secretion. The possible explanations of the off-response and the restoration of GH secretion by reintroducing normal buffer were discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kato et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: