We have developed a method for describing the reaction dynamics of a polyatomic molecule in intense laser fields. First, the dynamical behavior of H2+ and H2 in near-infrared, intense laser fields (I > 1013 W cm−2 and λ > 700 nm) was examined; accurate evaluation of the electronic and nuclear wave packet was achieved by the dual transformation method that we developed. Using “field-following” time-dependent adiabatic states defined as eigenfunctions of the “instantaneous” electronic Hamiltonian, we have clarified the dynamics of bound electrons, ionization processes, Coulomb explosion processes, and molecular vibrations of H2+ and H2. The analyses indicate that the multielectron dynamics and nuclear dynamics of polyatomic molecules in intense fields can be described by using the potential surfaces of time-dependent adiabatic states and the nonadiabatic coupling elements between those states. To obtain time-dependent adiabatic states of a molecule, one can diagonalize the electronic Hamiltonian including the interaction with the instantaneous laser electric field by ab initio molecular orbital (MO) methods. The time-dependent adiabatic potentials obtained are used to evaluate the multichannel nuclear dynamics until the next ionization process. We have applied the time-dependent adiabatic state approach to reveal the characteristic features of the dynamics of structural deformations of CO2 and its cations in a near-infrared intense laser field. The experimentally observed stretched and bent structure of CO23+ just before Coulomb explosions originates from the structural deformation of CO22+. We also revealed the mechanism of the experimentally observed bond dissociation of C2H5OH; we found that the relative probability of C–O bond cleavage to that of C–C bond cleavage becomes smaller with decreases in the pulse length. This example clearly shows that field-induced nonadiabatic transitions play a decisive role in the reaction dynamics of molecules in an intense laser field.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kono et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: