Key result
Only 1 of 11 national stroke registries captures adequate aneurysm-specific data for aSAH.
Why the study?
Implementation of evidence-based guidelines for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage remains inconsistent, and no previous review has evaluated national aSAH registries.
Few national stroke registries adequately capture aSAH-specific variables, highlighting a need for international harmonization of core aSAH data to improve global care.
BACKGROUND: Aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH) is a major cause of premature death and disability. Although evidence-based guidelines exist, implementation is inconsistent and variation in care persists. Ischaemic stroke registries have improved guideline-concordant care, and several reviews have described their variables, coverage, governance and resource requirements. However, there has been no previous review of national aSAH registries. AIMS: To systematically identify and describe aSAH registries with respect to governance, case identification, data collection and general characteristics. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE (Ovid) for English-language studies published from inception to 1st April 2026. Eligible registries included unselected national cohorts of aSAH patients with ≥1 year of prospective data collection. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts and full-texts. Data were extracted from peer-reviewed publications, registry websites or reports. RESULTS: Eleven registries were identified, established between 1994-2009. Only one was a dedicated aSAH registry and, of the screened stroke registries, ten included aSAH patients. Four mandated hospital participation, and 81.8% employed no-consent or opt-out models. Governance, case identification and data collection varied substantially, with limited standardisation of consent and data entry. While most captured core inpatient variables, only 36.4% included sufficient detail to derive aSAH severity scores or aneurysm characteristics. Most registries were government led, with variable coverage, quality control and feedback mechanisms, typically focused on ischaemic stroke rather than aSAH-specific indicators. CONCLUSION: Few stroke registries include aSAH patients, and most are not optimised to capture disease-specific variables. International harmonisation of core aSAH data variables and development of dedicated or nested registry modules is likely to improve global aSAH care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O’Donohoe et al. (2026) conducted a review in Aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (n=11). National aSAH registries was evaluated on Registry governance, case identification, data collection and general characteristics. A scoping review of 11 national registries found that only one was dedicated to aSAH, and most lacked sufficient detail to derive aSAH severity scores or aneurysm characteristics.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: