Why the study?
Barriers hinder cardiac rehabilitation utilization, and incorporating patient perspectives on nurse-led cardiac telerehabilitation could help develop a program protocol to alleviate obstacles in coronary heart disease.
What is the acceptability, preferred medium, and desired components of nurse-led cardiac telerehabilitation among Chinese patients with coronary heart disease?
What is the acceptability, preferred medium, and desired components of nurse-led cardiac telerehabilitation among Chinese patients with coronary heart disease?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
There is high acceptability and demand for nurse-led cardiac telerehabilitation among Chinese patients with CHD, particularly for education and drug information delivered via hospital-designed applications.
Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a comprehensive and multidisciplinary secondary prevention care in coronary heart disease (CHD). There are barriers at the patient and health system levels that prevent CR from being utilized. Cardiac telerehabilitation led by nurses (Ne-CTR) can alleviate the obstacles to participation in CR. A patient perspective can improve CR access. This study was the first pre-program investigation to clarify the status of knowledge and participation in CTR. We sought to clarify the acceptability, the reasons for rejection, the desired form, components, and associated factors with the components needed for (Ne-CTR) in patients with CHD. The study aimed to help develop a protocol for Ne-CTR for Chinese patients with CHD. A cross-sectional study was conducted between 2020 and 2021. Hospitals in four provinces in China were included. The participants were 671 patients with CHD in hospitals located in three regions of China. A self-administered questionnaire collected information about demographics, knowledge, and participation in CTR, acceptability, preferred medium, and components of Ne-CTR. Student’s t-test, analysis of variance, and multiple linear regression analyzed the factors associated with component needs. All the analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS version 25.0. Most participants ( n = 434, 66.77%) had a poor understanding and participation in CTR. In addition, 65.38% ( n = 439) of participants were willing to accept the Ne-CTR program, and 43.56% ( n = 98) identified safety as reasons for not accepting such a program. In the group accepting Ne-CTR, 35% chose hospital-designed professional applications as a medium for Ne-CTR when offered. Education (4.44 ± 1.056) and drug information (4.44 ± 1.040) had the highest average need score. Education, monthly income, marital status, previous CTR participation, and health insurance were associated with the demand level scores of Ne-CTR. This study demonstrated high levels of need for Ne-CTR among patients with CHD and identified the desired medium, components, and associated factors of Ne-CTR. These findings provide reference information for the construction of a Ne-CTR program.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hong et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: