In 1972, Liu claimed that for any task systems to be scheduled on m 1 identical processors, the ratio of the optimal nonpreemptive schedule length versus the optimal preemptive schedule length is bounded above by $2m/( m + 1 )$. Furthermore, Liu showed that the bound is the best possible by giving a task system achieving the ratio. His upper bound proof was later found to be incorrect, and his claim has since remained a conjecture. In this paper, it is shown that Liu’s bound is valid for the unit execution time (UET) and tree-structured task systems. For two processors, it is shown that some other classes of task systems satisfy the 4/3 bound. Other results comparing the lengths of optimal list, nonpreemptive schedules, and preemptive schedules are also given.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hong et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: