Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We describe near-infrared ( JHK ) imaging polarimetry of 21 embedded protostars in the Taurus-Auriga molecular cloud. These objects display extended, highly polarized reflection nebulae with V-shaped, unipolar, and bipolar morphologies. Most sources have P K ≈ 5%-20% in an 8'' aperture; a few objects have P K ≲ 5%. The polarization increases toward shorter wavelengths and is generally aligned perpendicular to the long axis of the reflection nebula. We develop an analytic scattering model for the near-IR colors and polarizations of embedded protostars. Our Taurus data require visual extinctions, A V ≈ 25-60 mag, comparable to those predicted for models of collapsing clouds. The ratio of scattered flux to intrinsic source flux ranges from F s / F 0 ≈ 0.001 at 1.25 μm to F s / F 0 ≈ 0.015 at 3.5 μm. These results indicate that the observed ratio of scattered light to direct (extincted) light increases from F s / F d ~ 0.1 at 3.5 μm to F s / F d ~ 25 at 1.25 μm. Our data further require intrinsic colors of 0.6 ≲ J - H ≲ 0.9, 0.3 ≲ H - K ≲ 0.6, and 0.4 ≲ K - L ≲ 1.2 for the central sources of Taurus protostars. We adopt the Terebey, Shu, & Cassen solution for an infalling, rotating protostellar cloud and use a two dimensional Monte Carlo radiative transfer code to model the near-IR polarization data for this sample. Our results indicate envelope parameters in agreement with previous estimates from broadband spectral energy distributions and near-IR images. We estimate infall rates, ~(2-5) × 10 −6 M ☉ yr -1 ; centrifugal radii, R c ~ 10-50 AU; and opening angles of the bipolar cavity, θ h ≈ 10°-20°, for a typical object. Standard grain parameters can explain the near-IR colors and polarizations of Taurus protostars. The polarization maps show that Taurus grains have a high maximum polarization at K , P max, K ≳ 80%. The large image sizes of this sample further imply a high K -band albedo, ω K ≈ 0.3-0.4. Model polarization maps indicate that the size of the "polarization disk" increases with the size of the instrumental point-spread function. Relating the morphology of polarization vectors to disk or envelope properties thus requires some care and a good understanding of the characteristics of the instrument.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Whitney et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: