Trimethoprim and sulphisoxazole were used as selective agents in culture to isolate, by a stepwise procedure, a series of Chlamydia trachomatis L2 populations resistant to the cytotoxic effects of the drugs. Two trimethoprim-resistant populations, L2TriR-60 and L2TriR-100, and one sulphonamide-resistant population, L2SulfR-100, were characterized in more detail. In addition to being resistant to trimethoprim, L2TriR-60 was cross-resistant to methotrexate, sensitive to sulphisoxazole and displayed a ribonucleotide auxotrophy similar to that of its parental wild type, C. trachomatis L2. Surprisingly, L2TriR-100 and L2SulfR-100 appeared phenotypically identical. Both mutants were highly resistant to trimethoprim, sulphisoxazole, and methotrexate. In contrast to wild-type C. trachomatis L2, these populations were sensitive to 5-fluorouracil. L2TriR-100 and L2SulfR-100 were incapable of taking pyrimidine ribonucleotides from the host cell and no longer synthesized thymidine nucleotides de novo. The pyrimidine requirement of these mutants was met by salvaging host-cell uracil and thymidine, a property which can account for their drug-resistant characteristics. L2TriR-100 and L2SulfR-100 could also salvage adenine and guanine. Using L2TriR-100 as a starting stock, a mutant population resistant to the cytotoxic effects of trimethoprim and 5-fluorouracil (L2Tri/5-FU) was selected. L2Tri/5-FU was resistant to 5-fluorouracil because it had regained the capacity to take pyrimidine ribonucleotides from the host cell.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: