Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Due to their decentralized and trustless nature, blockchain and distributed ledger technologies are increasingly used in several domains, including critical applications. The behavior of such blockchain-integrated systems is typically driven by smart contracts. However, smart contracts are application-specific software and may contain faults with severe system-level impacts. This is especially true in the case of the extensively used Hyperledger Fabric (HLF) platform, where smart contracts are written in general-purpose languages (Java, among others), and applications can go far beyond handling virtual-currency-like assets. In this work, we present a novel formal-verification-based approach to smart contract verification and a high-level empirical model of the HLF platform. Our Smart Contract in the Loop (SCIL) method uses a model checker (Java Pathfinder) to check whether specific error properties hold for a given smart contract, while a predefined combination of platform-level fault modes is active. We facilitate the checking of HLF smart contracts without modification and enable the propagation or non-propagation of platform faults through the smart contracts to the system failure level.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Péter et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: