This study investigated chickpea protein concentrates from two kabuli and two desi cultivars to elucidate how cultivar-specific differences influence their techno-functional, thermal, structural, and morphological characteristics. Through the integration of diverse methodological approaches within a single study, the present study aimed to determine how cultivar-specific variations shape the characteristics of chickpea protein concentrates and, consequently, their potential functionality in food applications. Protein, moisture, and ash contents of the CPCs were 64.5-74.8 g/100 g, 10.8-11.2 g/100 g, and 2.7-3.2 g/100 g, respectively. Free SH groups varied from 1.2 to 4.3 µmol/g, total SH groups ranged from 3.2 to 7.2 µmol/g, and particle sizes varied from 19.2 to 58.4 µm. Thereby, the desi CPCs consisted of larger particles. Zeta-potentials were positive at pH 2-4 and negative at pH 6-10. Kabuli CPCs exhibited higher lightness (L*>80) and yellow colour (b*>25), while desi CPCs exhibited higher red-green colour (a*>1.2). Foaming capacity ranged from 84.4% to 122.2%, and the foams were stable for 60 minutes, except for Elmo CPCs. Orion CPCs exhibited the highest emulsion capacity (12 m 2 /g) and the best oil holding capacity (4.2 g/g). Elmo CPCs had the highest emulsion stability index, and Nero the best water holding capacity (2.3 g/g). Considering the techno-functional properties of the CPCs, they show strong potential for application in dairy alternatives, plant-based meat analogues, protein-fortified beverages, bakery products, and aerated desserts. The observed cultivar-dependent differences, including colour characteristics, highlight the relevance of cultivar selection for tailoring chickpea protein concentrates to specific food applications, including products where a darker appearance is desirable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silva et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: