A molecular water oxidation catalyst based on the copper complex of general formula [(L py )Cu II ] 2–, 2 2–, (L py is 4-pyrenyl-1,2-phenylenebis(oxamidate) ligand) has been rationally designed and prepared to support a more extended π-conjugation through its structure in contrast with its homologue, the [(L)Cu II ] 2– water oxidation catalyst, 1 2– (L is o -phenylenebis(oxamidate)). The catalytic performance of both catalysts has been comparatively studied in homogeneous phase and in heterogeneous phase by π-stacking anchorage to graphene-based electrodes. In the homogeneous system, the electronic perturbation provided by the pyrene functionality translates into a 150 mV lower overpotential for 2 2– with respect to 1 2– and an impressive increase in the k cat from 6 to 128 s –1 . Upon anchorage, π-stacking interactions with the graphene sheets provide further π-delocalization that improves the catalytic performance of both catalysts. In this sense, 2 2– turned out to be the most active catalyst due to the double influence of both the pyrene and the graphene, displaying an overpotential of 538 mV, a k cat of 540 s –1 and producing more than 5300 TONs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Garrido‐Barros et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: