A compressed overview of complexity theory in public administration creates a starting point for comparison with other theories-in-use. The underpinning methodological traditions of extant theories of public administration are compared for compatibilities with complexity theory. Concepts generally acknowledged as within the scope and interest of public administration scholars (actors, policy processes, decisions, power, information and values) are used to extend the analysis of complexity theory’s contribution. The paper concludes that understanding the complexity friendliness of extant theories will both facilitate the greater use of complexity theory in PA and extend the explanatory capacity of the existing compatible theories.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elizabeth Eppel (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: