Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective cohort study demonstrates higher mortality with low blood pressure and elevated shock index in major trauma patients, indicating utility for early risk stratification.
Background Traumatic shock (TS) is implicated in up to 40% of early trauma deaths; however, no consensus definition exists, and its epidemiology and outcomes have not been characterised at a population level in Australia. Aims To apply a pragmatic clinical definition of TS, based on systolic blood pressure (SBP) and shock index (SI), to a national trauma registry, and to describe the epidemiology and outcomes of major trauma (MT) patients with and without clinical signs of shock. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted using Australia New Zealand Trauma Registry (ANZTR) data (2017–2022). TS was defined as pre-hospital SBP ≤90mmHg or SI >1, or hospital arrival SBP ≤90mmHg or SI >1. Epidemiology and outcomes were compared with patients without these features. Outcomes were reported as absolute risk differences and risk ratios alongside odds ratios; analyses were unadjusted. Results Among 47,730 adult MT patients in the hospital arrival analysis, 16,463 (34.5%) were excluded from the pre-hospital analysis due to incomplete centre-level data. Patients with pre-hospital or hospital arrival signs of TS were younger, more severely injured, and more likely to sustain penetrating trauma. Clinical signs of shock were associated with substantially higher absolute in-hospital mortality: h-SBP ≤90mmHg, 30.9% versus 7.4% (ARD 23.5 percentage points, 95% CI 21.7–25.3; RR 4.2); h-SI >1, 19.2% versus 7.1% (ARD 12.1; RR 2.7); with similar findings pre-hospital. ED mortality differences, although associated with very large odds ratios, were small in absolute terms given the low baseline (h-SBP ≤90mmHg: ARD 5.6%, RR 25.0, OR 26.5). A stepwise relationship between decreasing hospital arrival SBP and mortality was observed across thresholds of ≤100, ≤90, and ≤80mmHg. Patients with shock also had higher rates of operative intervention and longer ICU and acute hospital lengths of stay. Conclusions A pragmatic clinical definition of TS using SBP and SI identified a major trauma subgroup with substantially higher mortality and resource use. Although unadjusted analyses limit causal inference, this descriptive study provides a foundation for future validation and prospective research, while highlighting important gaps in national trauma registry data quality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Noonan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: