Collaborative field study reveals how oral histories guide mapping practices and legal claims in the Siekopai Nation, highlighting relational approaches to Indigenous territorial reclamation.
This thesis examines how oral histories function as a cartographic method within Siekopai mapping practices and territorial reclamation efforts in the northwestern Amazon. Focusing on the Siekopai Nation’s struggle to reclaim Pë’këya, an ancestral territory along the present-day Ecuador–Peru border, I argue that oral histories are not simply narratives represented within maps, but relational and place-based practices that orient and shape mapping itself. Drawing on my collaborative work with the Siekopai Nation, this field-informed study examines how oral histories organize territorial knowledge through movement, intergenerational transmission, and relations among human and more-than-human worlds, while also shaping participatory mapping practices and legal claims to territory. Oral histories emerge as a cartographic method by orienting mapping practices, enabling territorial reclamation, challenging dominant representations of territory, and foregrounding more relational and accountable approaches to cartographic research on Indigenous lands.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ina Shkurti (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: