This paper presents empirical evidence on the effects of environmental regulation announcements on corporate performance in China when performance is proxied by stock returns. While some results indicate the effectiveness of environmental regulation, others point to the opposite. The perverse results are explained in terms of the lack of enforcement of environmental regulation, which is attributed to legislative shortcomings, poorly designed policy instruments, an unsupportive work environment for environmental regulators, a pro-growth political and social environment, and a cultural predisposition to harmony and consensus-building among those involved in the process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramiah et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: