Theoretical framework proposes an identity between physical states and phenomenal experience, suggesting complex consciousness arises from multiscale structural integration.
The State–Experience Ontology proposes a foundational identity between state and phenomenal experience: S≡E. Rather than treating consciousness as a property generated by otherwise non-experiential matter, the framework hypothesizes that experience is intrinsic to state itself. The paper develops this idea through a layered framework involving state evolution, continuous state-bearing fields, information, structural integration, and multiscale organization. It proposes that complex consciousness may correspond to highly organized configurations of interacting states, while treating the formal connection to quantum mechanics, field theory, neuroscience, and phenomenology as an open research problem. This work is presented as a conceptual ontology and research program. It does not claim to replace established physical theories, but proposes a foundational hypothesis and a methodological pathway toward its future mathematical formalization and empirical investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bekhruz Suleyman (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: