Experimental-numerical modeling demonstrates waste heat recovery improves ammonia-diesel marine engine thermal efficiency, indicating partial mitigation of high ammonia penalties.
Improving the thermal-efficiency limit of ammonia-diesel dual-fuel (ADDF) marine engines is critical for low-carbon and practically deployable marine propulsion. This study presents an integrated experimental-numerical framework that combines a calibrated GT-POWER ADDF combustion model with a MATLAB-based Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) model to quantify waste-heat-recovery effects under explicitly defined energy-boundary assumptions. The combustion model was calibrated using SJTU95 ADDF data and then transfer-guided and checked against V240 engine constraints over a wide range of ammonia energy ratios (0–83% AER); The SJTU175 platform was used for engine-ORC calibration. The engine outputs supplied to the ORC model include exhaust mass flow, exhaust temperature/enthalpy, jacket-water heat transfer and coolant temperature under different engine loads and AERs. The calibrated ADDF model predicts indicated thermal efficiency and peak cylinder pressure within ±5% of the available V240 measurements across the investigated AER range, while the ORC unit delivers 105.3–145.5 kW of net recovered power, corresponding to cycle efficiencies of 8.8%–9.3% and total system output gains of 5.2%–7.2%. At 65% AER, the combined engine-ORC system reaches a thermal efficiency of 37.6%, corresponding to 91.0% of the pure-diesel baseline, while at 83% AER, it retains 86.8% of the baseline performance. These results define a realistic thermal-efficiency benchmark for ORC-assisted ADDF marine engines and show that waste heat recovery can substantially mitigate, though not fully eliminate, the efficiency penalty associated with high ammonia substitution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: