Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Psychometric evaluation demonstrates a dual-factor structure for the WARNS in high school students, supporting balanced assessment of both risks and strengths.
The Washington Assessment of the Risks and Needs of Students (WARNS) is used to identify student risks and needs associated with absenteeism and truancy. This study evaluated an updated factor structure for the WARNS, aiming to enhance its utility for identifying both student risks and strengths. Confirmatory factor analysis compared several models, including a symmetrical bifactor model and a two-factor higher-order model distinguishing Risk and Strengths dimensions. The two-factor higher-order and the bifactor models were preferred models, supporting scoring validity and different aspects of interpretation and use. Reliability analyses indicated high internal consistency and moderate test–retest reliability across domains. The revised WARNS structure enables practitioners to identify areas of concern and domains of strength, facilitating more targeted strategies and conversations with students. The dual-factor framework aligns with contemporary models of positive youth development and supports holistic, student-centered practices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
French et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: