Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Narrative review outlines disaster preparedness and recovery frameworks for hemodialysis units, highlighting strategies to prevent care disruptions and reduce mortality during crises.
Hemodialysis is a life-sustaining therapy that depends on uninterrupted access to electricity, clean water, medical supplies, and trained staff. This dependence makes hemodialysis units uniquely vulnerable to disasters such as natural catastrophes, power failures, pandemics, or civil emergencies. The COVID-19 pandemic, major earthquakes, and large-scale floods have highlighted the fragility of dialysis infrastructure worldwide. This review synthesizes available evidence on disaster preparedness, response, and recovery in hemodialysis centers. Drawing on international experiences and existing guidelines, it proposes a framework to enhance resilience and ensure continuity of dialysis care during crises. Key strategies include structured risk assessment, patient and staff education, backup systems for power and water, coordinated regional response networks, and incorporation of disaster readiness into routine dialysis operations. Strengthening preparedness at every level—from the individual center to national health systems—is vital to prevent avoidable morbidity and mortality among this highly vulnerable population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hashmi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: