Safety and Efficacy Assessment of Cannabis Plant Compared to Atorvastatin for Lipid Lowering in Diabetic and Obese Wistar Male Rats

Introduction. Statins’ established cardiovascular benefits are often undermined by hepatic adverse effects in obese diabetic patients with suspected non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. We evaluated whether cannabis plant treatment is a safe and effective alternative to atorvastatin in a metabolically challenged rodent model. Methods. Fourteen obese and diabetic Wistar rats received either atorvastatin for 30 days or cannabis plant extract for 30 days. Main outcome: lipid profile; secondary outcomes: renal function, glycemia and endothelial health assessed through atherogenic indices. Safety was assessed using plasma liver enzyme concentrations. Results. Baseline biochemical profiles were similar between groups. Atorvastatin increased HDL-Col more than cannabis plant (MD: 44.3; IQR [33, 57.5] mg/dL, Hedges’ g 2.713 vs. MD: 14.3; IQR [14, 17] mg/dL, Hedges’ g 5.049), and cannabis plant did not change LDL-Col. Atherogenic index of plasma and Castelli Risk Index 1 improved with both interventions, more so with atorvastatin. Liver enzymes increased with atorvastatin (ALAT, MD: 15.9; IQR [12.5, 19.5] U/L; ASAT, MD: 33; IQR [26.5, 38] U/L) but remained virtually unchanged with cannabis. Serum creatinine increased with cannabis plant, with moderate effect size (Hedges’ g 0.798), but negligibly with statins (Hedges’ g 0.122). Conclusions. Cannabis plant extract modestly improved the lipid profile and atherogenic indices, with differences often not exceeding the change in control groups. Despite apparent liver safety, the undesired renal and neurological consequences limit applicability in humans. Further studies should prioritize addiction development and renal function.