Randomized trial demonstrates modest insertion rate gains from simulator practice in gastroenterology trainees, indicating virtual tools serve as a feasible training adjunct.
OBJECTIVES: Simulation-based colonoscopy training may support early acquisition of insertion skills, but its clinical effect remains uncertain. We evaluated whether a self-directed curriculum using the mikoto colonoscopy simulator improved insertion performance in gastroenterology trainees. METHODS: In this multicenter cluster-randomized trial, 12 gastroenterology trainees from 11 institutions in Japan and Taiwan were assigned 1:1 to mikoto simulator training or standard training, with the trainee as the unit of randomization. Each trainee performed 35 colonoscopies; intervention-arm trainees additionally completed 100 self-directed simulator sessions over 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was post-training cecal intubation rate (CIR), compared using mixed-effects logistic regression with trainee as a random intercept and pre-training CIR as a covariate. RESULTS: A total of 420 colonoscopies were analyzed. Post-training CIR was 80.0% (72/90) in the mikoto group versus 77.8% (70/90) in controls (adjusted OR, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-4.84; p = 0.606). Within the mikoto group, CIR increased from 60.0% to 80.0% (p = 0.003) and cecal intubation time decreased, but the group-by-period interaction was not significant. Detection outcomes were unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Although the between-group difference in post-training CIR did not reach statistical significance, self-directed mikoto simulator training produced a significant within-group improvement in CIR and a parallel reduction in cecal intubation time, supporting it as a feasible and educationally meaningful adjunct to conventional colonoscopy training for gastroenterology trainees. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000054647.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamaguchi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: