Bibliometric analysis reveals distinct global and local patent trends in dissolved organic matter heavy metal remediation, highlighting policy-driven engineering translation.
Conventional heavy metal remediation technologies are constrained by low efficiency, secondary pollution risks, and limited scalability. Dissolved organic matter (DOM), with its green, cost-effective complexation properties, has become a promising pathway for pollution control. Existing patent bibliometric studies in this field suffer from single-database bias, limited causal quantification of policy impacts, and incomplete depiction of global–local technological heterogeneity. To address these gaps, this study maps the technological innovation landscape of DOM interactions with four typical heavy metals (Cd, Pb, Cu, Zn) during 2004–2024, using a complementary dual-database framework combining Derwent and IncoPat. We integrate a three-dimensional “time–region–technology” analytical framework with interrupted time series analysis (ITSA), after standardized data processing including family deduplication and citation normalization. Cross-validation confirms that China contributes the largest share of global patent output (46.6% in Derwent, 55.0% in IncoPat). Three milestone environmental policies in China exert sequentially intensifying causal effects on patent growth (all p < 0.05), forming a closed-loop mechanism of policy orientation, funding support, technology transfer, and international diffusion. We identify a pronounced global–local technological divergence: global frontier innovation centers on digital basic research, whereas local innovation in China prioritizes engineering applications. Core patents advance the field through cross-domain technology adaptation, and the representative technical paradigm (exemplified by patent CN101168852A) has been industrially validated. These findings provide empirical support for engineering translation and policy optimization in DOM-based heavy metal remediation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: