Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Critical review reveals an absence of mathematical proofs supporting 2025–2026 Orch-OR consciousness claims, indicating a reliance on promotional media over rigorous physics.
FINDING: No new mathematical evidence for Penrose-Hameroff Orch-OR in 2025-2026; sources are popular videos and a conference review, not peer-reviewed mathematical proofs. | MATH: No equations, constants, or ratios extracted from the provided sources. | CONNECTION: No geometric harmony links (0.382, 0.618, 0.786, 1.618, 2.618, base-60, crystallographic symmetry) found. | DEPTH: 1 — The findings are promotional summaries, not mathematical advances. The only arXiv paper (MOASEI competition) is unrelated to consciousness or quantum physics. Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrew Stewart Caldin (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: