There are two basic approaches to internal-tin Nb/sub 3/Sn conductor design. 1) Maintaining individually separated filaments after reaction and 2) allowing groups of filaments to bridge, while, at the same time ensuring that the overall size of the agglomerate is limited in order to control the effective filament diameter (d/sub eff/) and losses. In this paper we discuss recent developments in both of these conductor types. The strand for the Levitated Dipole Experiment (LDX) is illustrative of type 1, and the most significant development in this area Is a react-and-wind conductor soldered into a copper channel. In category 2, conductors with higher current density capabilities have been made primarily for High Energy Physics applications, although they can also be used in small high field magnets. Many of these conductors have much higher losses than the other type. Some of the factors controlling piece length, critical current density (J/sub c/) and losses are discussed for a series of different designs, filament sizes and compositions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pyon et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: