The influence of the higher modes and their consideration in the pushover analysis of reinforced concrete single column bent viaducts with different degree of irregularity is discussed. Typical multimode pushover-based methods (modal pushover analysis, modal adaptive non-linear static procedure and incremental response spectrum analysis) are addressed and compared with a single mode procedure (N2) and inelastic time history analysis. If in the transverse direction the substructure of the viaduct is flexible in comparison with the superstructure, the influence of higher modes is small (the structure is regular) and single mode procedure works well. This typically occurs when the columns are high or considerably damaged. Conversely, for the analysis of irregular structures having short and slightly damaged columns, the multimode methods are needed. In most cases, all the analysed multimode pushover-based methods have given the results comparable with time history analysis, with the exception of cases where torsional sensitivity is varying during the response. All the methods have limitations (discussed in detail in the paper), which should be fully recognized by the user.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Isaković et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: