The reactions of Ru + with C 2 H 6, C 3 H 8, HC(CH 3 ) 3, and c -C 3 H 6 at hyperthermal energies have been studied using guided ion beam mass spectrometry. It is found that dehydrogenation is efficient and the dominant process at low energies in all four reaction systems. At high energies, C-H cleavage processes dominate the product spectrum for the reactions of Ru + with ethane, propane, and isobutane. C-C bond cleavage is a dominant process in the cyclopropane system. The reactions of Ru + are compared with those of the first-row transition metal congener Fe + and the differences in behavior and mechanism are discussed in some detail. Modeling of the endothermic reaction cross sections yields the 0-K bond dissociation energies (in eV) of D 0 (Ru-H)=2.27±0.15, D 0 (Ru + -C)=4.70±0.11, D 0 (Ru + -CH)=5.20±0.12, D 0 (Ru + -CH 2 )=3.57±0.05, D 0 (Ru + -CH 3 )=1.66±0.06, D 0 (Ru-CH 3 )=1.68±0.12, D 0 (Ru + -C 2 H 2 )=1.98±0.18, D 0 (Ru + -C 2 H 3 )=3.03±0.07, and D 0 (Ru + -C 3 H 4 )=2.24±0.12. Speculative bond energies for Ru + =CCH 2 of 3.39±0.19 eV and Ru + =CHCH 3 of 3.19±0.15 eV are also obtained. The observation of exothermic processes sets lower limits for the bond energies of Ru + to ethene, propene, and isobutene of 1.34, 1.22, and 1.14 eV, respectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Armentrout et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: