PURPOSE: To compare higher order aberrations measured with the NIDEK OPD-Scan and AMO WaveScan. METHODS: Third- to sixth-order higher order aberrations were measured in 1072 eyes using the OPD-Scan and WaveScan. Means, standard deviations, confidence intervals, limits of agreement, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated. RESULTS: Aberrations of greatest magnitude with the OPD-Scan were Z-³/₃ (-0.113 +/- 0.243 μm), Z⁰/₄ (0.073 +/- 0.137 μm), and Z-¹/₃(-0.058 +/- 0.165 μm), and with the WaveScan, 7-³/₃ (-0.054 +/- 0.103 μm), Z⁰/₄ (0.049 +/- 0.083 μm), and Z¹/₃ (-0.017 +/- 0.100 μm). The largest difference in magnitude between the two aberrometers was with Zernike polynomial Z-³/₃ (-0.060 +/- 0.205 μm). Medium consistency (0.6 < ICC < 0.8) was found between the two instruments for Z-¹/₃ and Z⁰/₄. All other Zernike polynomials had a poor consistency (ICC < 0.6) including the total root-mean-square (RMS) higher order aberrations. CONCLUSIONS: Poor consistency was found for all aberrations except Z-¹/₃and Z⁰/₄, which demostrated medium consistency. Expected aberration reference values are reported for both instruments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McAlinden et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: