A previous derivation of the generalized Auger transition for inner-shell multiplets is shown to be incorrect. The previous derivation was based on deducing a coupling scheme from 6-j symbols in the transition-rate expression, then transforming the coupling coefficients. It was expected that the transformed transition rate would be correct up to a phase factor. It is shown here that this expectation is incorrect. The transformed transition-rate expression is structurally incorrect (i.e., incorrect irrespective of phase factor). Correct expressions are obtained by direct manipulation of 6-j and 9-j symbols. It is shown that the correct expression can be found using the coupling transformation provided a modified matrix element expression is used.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
E. J. McGuire (1975) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Physical Review A