Why the study?
How does a direct immunoradiometric assay compare to an enzymatic renin assay for measuring plasma renin and prorenin in healthy infants and children?
How does a direct immunoradiometric assay compare to an enzymatic renin assay for measuring plasma renin and prorenin in healthy infants and children?
A direct immunoradiometric assay is comparable to the traditional enzymatic assay for measuring renin and prorenin in infants and children, confirming age-related decreases in these biomarkers.
Immunoradiometric assay correlates with enzymatic renin measurement in children; supports age-related decline but leaves open clinical outcome validation.
We compared plasma active and inactive renin (prorenin) concentrations and activities in infants and children, as measured with a newly available direct immunoradiometric assay kit for active renin and a widely used enzymatic renin assay (plasma renin activity). The study was performed in 57 healthy infants and children under steady-state conditions and in eight subjects after orthostatic stimulation. Our study; (i) reports concentrations for active and inactive renin determined by the immunoradiometric assay in normal infants and children; (ii) confirms, by use of the immunoradiometric assay, the previously described decrease in plasma active and inactive renin, as measured by the enzymatic assay, with increasing age; and (iii) shows close correlations between the results obtained by immunoradiometric and enzymatic assays for active and inactive renin in normal infants and children.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Blazy et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: