Plant population of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] may influence the residual N contribution to a cropping system and yield benefits to following cereals. Field studies were conducted from 1994 to 1996 on a N‐depleted Sharpsburg silty clay loam soil at Mead, NE to: (i) determine soybean yield at different plant populations; (ii) investigate residual N, chlorophyll–N–yield relations, and yield benefits from these different soybean populations to a following maize (Zea mays L.) crop; (iii) and compare N credits from soybean assessed with fallow and cereal plots as references. Eight soybean populations from14 000 to 544 000 plants ha−1 in narrow 50‐cm rows, a fallow plot, and a maize plot were followed by maize in a rotation study. Soybean yield was highest at populations of ≥129 000 plants ha−1. Maize grain yields were highest following fallow and soybean populations <20 000 plants ha−1, intermediate following higher soybean populations, and least in continuous maize. This is most likely due to N uptake as indicated by chlorophyll and N accumulation of maize. Nitrogen credits to maize were 16 to 46 kg N ha−1 when calculated as Nitrogen Fertilizer Replacement Values (NFRVs). This is probably overestimating the potential N contribution from soybean because N credits from soybean populations assessed with fallow instead of maize as references were negative. A net positive N balance due to soybean reached a maximum of 17 kg N ha−1, but soil N was depleted at populations <20 000 plants ha−1. We conclude that yield increases of maize in rotation with soybean may be due to N from reduced N immobilization, N added to the soil from N2 fixation, and possibly from non‐N rotation effects such as water use efficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ennin et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: