The photophysical properties of a perylene−porphyrin dyad have been examined with the aim of using this construct for molecular photonics applications. The dyad consists of a perylene-bis(imide) dye (PDI) connected to a zinc porphyrin (Zn) via a diphenylethyne linker (pep). In both polar and nonpolar solvents, the photoexcited perylene unit (PDI*) decays very rapidly (lifetimes of 2.5 (toluene) and 2.4 ps (acetonitrile)) by energy transfer to the porphyrin, forming PDI−pep−Zn* in high yield (80%, toluene; 70% acetonitrile), and hole transfer to the porphyrin, forming PDI - −pep−Zn + in lesser yield (20%, toluene; 30% acetonitrile). In both toluene and acetonitrile, the Zn* excited state subsequently decays with a lifetime of 0.4 ns primarily (80%) by electron transfer to the perylene (forming PDI - −pep−Zn + ). In the nonpolar solvent (toluene), the PDI - −pep−Zn + charge-transfer product has a lifetime of >10 ns and decays by charge recombination primarily to the ground state but also by thermal repopulation of the Zn* excited state. The occurrence of the latter process provides a direct experimental measure of the energy of the charge-separated state. In the polar solvent (acetonitrile), the PDI - −pep−Zn + charge-separated state decays much more rapidly (<0.5 ns) and exclusively to the ground state. In general, the complementary perylene and porphyrin absorption properties together with very fast and efficient PDI*−pep−Zn → PDI−pep−Zn* energy transfer suggest that perylenes have significant potential as accessory pigments in porphyrin-based arrays for light-harvesting and energy-transport applications. Furthermore, the finding of fast energy transfer initiated in PDI*, charge-transfer reactions that can be elicited either in PDI* or Zn*, and a charge-separated state (PDI - −pep−Zn + ) that can be long- or short-lived depending on solvent polarity, indicates the versatility of the perylene−porphyrin motif for a variety of applications in molecular photonics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prathapan et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: