I compared the efficacy of terrestrial, arboreal, carnivore, and pitfall trapping methods for censusing small (<3kg) mammals in north-eastern Queensland rainforest, using capture data for 17 rodent or marsupial species (3685 individuals) collected in 1986-87. Terrestrial and arboreal traps had the highest standardised capture rates (>200 animals per 1000 trap-nights), whereas carnivore (83.7 animals per 1000 trap-nights) and pitfall (9.1 animals per 1000 trap-nights) traps were less effective. However, each method was particularly effective for 1-4 species, with factors such as diet, vertical microhabitat use, body size and trap avoidance strongly influencing trappability of different species. Strategies for censusing small mammals in tropical rainforest are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
W. F. Laurance (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: