Why the study?
The distinct roles and expression patterns of group V and group IIA secretory phospholipase A2 enzymes in atherosclerosis were not fully understood.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Secretory phospholipases A2 group V and IIA demonstrate distinct regulation and lipoprotein activity profiles, suggesting divergent pathophysiological roles in the development of atherosclerosis.
Objective—To study the distribution of group V secretory phospholipase A2(sPLA2) in human and mouse lesions and compare its expression by human vascular cells, its activity toward lipoproteins, and the interaction with arterial proteoglycans (proteoglycans) with those of sPLA2-IIA. In addition, we also investigated the effect of a Western diet and lipopolysaccharide challenge on the aortic expression of these enzymes in mouse models.Methods and Results—Immunohistochemistry showed sPLA2-V in human and mouse lesions to be associated with smooth muscle cells and also surrounding foam cells in lipid core areas. mRNA of the enzyme was expressed in human lesions and human vascular cells, supporting the immunohistochemistry data. sPLA2-V but not sPLA2-IIA was active on lipoproteins in human serum. The association with proteoglycans enhanced 2- to 3-fold sPLA2-V activity toward low-density lipoproteins but not that of the group IIA enzyme. Experiments in mouse models showed that treatment with a Western diet induced expression of sPLA2-V but not that of sPLA2-IIA in aorta. On the other hand, lipopolysaccharide-induced acute inflammation augmented the expression of sPLA2-IIA but not that of sPLA2-V.Conclusions—These results indicate that these phospholipases could have different roles in atherosclerosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rosengren et al. (2006) studied Atherosclerosis. Secretory phospholipase A2 Group V (sPLA2-V) vs. sPLA2-IIA was evaluated on Enzyme distribution, lipoprotein activity, and expression response to diet and inflammation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: