Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the wavefront-optimized algorithm of the Allegretto Wave Eye-Q (Wavelight AG) 400-Hz excimer laser platform. METHODS: Three hundred three eyes of 303 patients treated with advanced surface ablation were evaluated prospectively. Topical mitomycin C (MMC) was used when ablation was ≥80 μm. Efficacy, safety, and predictability at 12 months were quantified with subjective refraction, visual acuity (logMAR), and slit-lamp examination. RESULTS: Mean postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was 20/20.5 (0.01±0.05 logMAR). Postoperative UDVA was equal or better than preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) in 94.7% of eyes. Efficacy index was 1.05. Corrected distance visual acuity was maintained (93.7%) or improved (5.9%) in 99.6% of treated eyes. No patient lost ≥2 lines. Safety index was 1.05. Haze at 12 months was grade ≤0.5 in 98% of treated eyes and grade ≤1 in 100% of treated eyes. Mean postoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) was -0.03±0.15 diopters (D). Postoperative MRSE was within ±0.50 D in 99% of eyes. Overcorrection was documented in 0.66% and undercorrection in 0.33% of eyes. CONCLUSIONS: The wavefront-optimized algorithm of the Allegretto Wave Eye-Q excimer laser platform showed good efficacy, safety, and predictability in advanced surface ablation, with or without MMC intraoperative use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gambato et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: