Background SARS-CoV-2 resistance to nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NMV/r) surveillance is essential to identify emergence and track treatment-resistance. Methods This integrative virologic analysis across EPIC ( E valuation of P rotease I nhibition of C OVID-19) phase 2/3 clinical studies (-High Risk [HR], -Standard Risk [SR], -Immunocompromised [IC], -Retreatment) used next-generation sequencing to identify SARS-CoV-2 variants and M pro or cleavage site emergent substitutions (ES). Treatment ES (TES) and ES in patients experiencing COVID-19‒related hospitalisation or viral RNA rebound were evaluated for in vitro NMV resistance, structure analysis, and global incidence via GISAID EpiCoV SARS-CoV-2 database. Findings Sequences were evaluated in 1605 NMV/r, 1216 placebo (PBO), and 114 PBO/r-treated participants. NMV/r M pro TES were observed in EPIC-HR/SR (pooled) (T98I/R/del [n = 4], E166V [n = 3], W207L/R/del [n = 4]), cleavage (A5328 S/V [n = 7], S6799 A/P/Y [n = 4]). PBO cleavage ES were observed (A5328T [n = 1], S6799F [n = 1]). Among hospitalised NMV/r-treated participants (EPIC-HR [n = 10], –SR [n = 5], –IC [n = 2], –Retreatment [n = 0]), 2 M pro ES were observed: A260T (EPIC-HR [n = 1]), K269R (EPIC-SR [n = 1]). In EPIC-IC, 3 M pro ES (T98S, A191V, T201I) and 2 cleavage site ES (A4136V, S4145N) were observed with rebound. E166V was the only TES associated with resistance (NMV/r: HR [n = 3]; PBO/r: –Retreatment [n = 1]), but not in participants experiencing hospitalisation or with immunocompromising conditions. Global E166V incidence was rare (<0.001% in pre- and post-NMV/r emergency use authorization) by GISAID (December 1, 2019–June 30, 2024). Interpretation In EPIC, NMV-resistance mutations were infrequent. E166V was the only resistance-associated substitution but was not identified in participants experiencing hospitalisation or with immunocompromising conditions. NCT04960202, NCT05011513, NCT05438602, NCT05567952.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baniecki et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: