Design
Review
Supports updated endocrine-paracrine RAS models in research; does not warrant changes to ACE inhibitor use.
The discovery of the components of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in various tissues gave rise to the idea that functional “tissue” RASs exist that are more or less independent of the hormonal RAS. Further support for this notion came from the recent demonstration of the mRNA for the protein components of the RAS in a number of organs. Last but not least, the introduction of the converting-enzyme (CE) inhibitors, generating an enormous scientific interest in the role of the RAS, has contributed to the concept of “tissue” RASs, since some of the effects of these drugs were thought to be reconciled better with “tissue” than with plasma RAS inhibition. However, this model of plasma vs. “tissue” RAS still suffers from a number of conceptual problems. For instance, with respect to the “tissue” RAS in the vascular wall, it is not clear at present whether angiotensin-con-verting enzyme (ACE) is at all active inside endothelial cells. In addition, all evidence available speaks against its localization in the vascular media, while there may be some activity of the enzyme in the adventitial layer. Concerning the heart, there is at present no unequivocal evidence for a local angiotensin II (Ang II) production through ACE in cardiac tissue outside the coronary vessels. The localization of Ang II generation within tissue RASs in the adrenal gland or in the kidney, where Ang II may be generated through CE at the tubular brush border, are far from being elucidated. With some exceptions, such as the brain, the teslis, or tubular portions of the kidney, current evidence supports a model of endocrine vs. paracrine/autocrine RAS rather than “plasma” vs. “tissue” RAS. In the endocrine vs. paracrine/aulocrtne model, Ang II is always generated through ACE at the outer surface of endothelial cells, irrespective of whether its direct precursor, angiotensin I, is produced intracellularly in the vascular wall and secreted or produced in the circulating blood. Newly generated Ang II is endocrine when contributing to the circulating pool of Ang II, but is paracrine/autocrine when feeding back to adjacent cells (paracrine) or the same cell to which ACE is attached (autocrine). The endocrine RAS and the paracrine/autocrine RAS are thus intimately connected. Consequently, ACE inhibitors would always act upon ACE at the outer surface of the endotlhelium, i.e.. they would nut have to penetrate into deeper tissue compartments to inhibit both endocrine and paracrine Ang II.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Unger et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: