Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial demonstrates lower tumor recurrence with tenofovir versus entecavir in resected liver cancer, suggesting superior long-term protective efficacy.
Background: Nucleot(s)ide analog treatment (entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir (TDF)) is reported to be associated with decreased tumor recurrence and death in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, yet further work is needed to evaluate the different efficacies of these two agents on the prognosis of early-stage HBV-related HCC patients after curative liver resection. Material and methods: From July 2017 to January 2019, 148 patients with HBV-related HCC who underwent curative liver resection were randomized to receive TDF (n=74) or ETV (n=74) therapy. The primary end point was tumor recurrence in the intention-to-treat population. Overall survival and tumor recurrence of patients were compared by multivariable-adjusted Cox regression and competing risk analyses. Results: During the follow-up with continued antiviral therapy, 37 (25.0%) patients developed tumor recurrence, and 16 (10.8%) patients died (N=15) or received liver transplantation (N=1). In the intention-to-treat cohort, the recurrence-free survival for the TDF group was significantly better than that for the ETV group (P=0.026). In the multivariate analysis, the relative risks of recurrence and death/liver transplantation for ETV therapy were 3.056 (95% CI: 1.015–9.196; P=0.047) and 2.566 (95% CI: 1.264–5.228; P=0.009), respectively. Subgroup analysis of the PP population indicated a better overall survival and RFS of patients receiving TDF therapy (P=0.048; hazard ratio (HR) =0.362; 95% CI: 0.132–0.993 and P=0.014; HR =0.458; 95% CI: 0.245–0.856). Additionally, TDF therapy was an independent protective factor against late tumor recurrence (P=0.046; (HR)=0.432; 95% CI: 0.189–0.985) but not against early tumor recurrence (P=0.109; HR =1.964; 95% CI: 0.858–4.494). Conclusion: HBV-related HCC patients treated with consistent TDF therapy had a significantly lower risk of tumor recurrence than those treated with ETV after curative treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: