Density functional theory optimizations with GGA functionals that include an empirical correction term for the dispersion energy (denoted as -D) have been performed for the van der Waals dimer of porphine. Interaction energies also have been obtained with a recently developed double-hybrid functional (B2-PLYP-D) and at the SCS-MP2 level of theory. The preferred conformer is a parallel displaced complex (1.72 Å lateral displacement) with an interplanar distance of 3.27 Å. The orientation (rotation) of the two monomers has only minor effects (<1 kcal mol− 1) on the binding energy ΔE, implying a certain flexibility of mutual movement around the monomer principal axes. The best estimate for ΔE is − 25 kcal mol− 1 with B2-PLYP-D. The also investigated T-shaped structures are much higher (about 15 kcal mol− 1) in energy. While dispersion contributions are absolutely essential for the binding of all investigated structures, the electrostatic contributions mainly determine the preferred conformations (e.g. displacement versus rotation).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mück‐Lichtenfeld et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: