Key result
Dapagliflozin treatment for 6 months in stable HFrEF patients improved left ventricular ejection fraction and ventilatory efficiency, but did not significantly improve peak oxygen intake (16.0 vs 16.2 mL/kg/min, p=0.297).
Why the study?
Although SGLT2-i are standard therapy for heart failure, a holistic evaluation of dapagliflozin across exercise performance, cardiac remodeling, biomarkers, fluid retention, and renal and pulmonary function was needed.
Does dapagliflozin improve exercise capacity, cardiac remodeling, and biomarkers in stable HFrEF patients?
Cohort (n=75)
Single-blind
No
Does dapagliflozin improve exercise capacity, cardiac remodeling, and biomarkers in stable HFrEF patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 16% vs 16.2%
p-value: p=0.297
Dapagliflozin linked to LV remodeling and ventilatory gains without peak VO2 or biomarker changes; leaves open clinical relevance in HFrEF.
Background Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2-i) are standard therapy for heart failure (HF). We performed a holistic evaluation of dapagliflozin, including its effects on exercise performance, left ventricle (LV) reverse remodeling, cardiac biomarkers, fluid retention, and renal and pulmonary function. Methods We enrolled HF reduced ejection fraction (LVEF) outpatients (EF <40%) eligible for SGLT2-i and performed cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPET), pulmonary function tests, bioelectrical impedance vector analysis, and laboratory and echocardiographic assessments at baseline (T = 0), after 2–4 weeks (T1), and after 6 months of treatment (T2). Results None of the patients interrupted SGLT2-i for adverse events albeit follow-up was completed by 67 of 75 enrolled patients. At T2, mean LVEF increased (from 34.6 ± 7.8 to 37.5 ± 9.2%; p < 0.001) while end-diastolic (EDV) and end-systolic (ESV) volumes decreased [EDV: 186 (145–232) vs. 177 (129–225) mL, ESV: 113 (87–163) vs. 110 (76–145) mL; p < 0.001]. Peak oxygen intake was unchanged [peakVO2: 16.2 (13.4–18.7) vs. 16.0 (13.3–18.9) mL/kg/min; p = 0.297], while exercise ventilatory efficiency (VE/VCO2 slope) improved [from 34.2 (31.1–39.2) to 33.7 (30.2–37.6); p = 0.006]. Mean hemoglobin increased (from 13.8 ± 1.5 to 14.6 ± 1.7 g/dL; p < 0.001), while renal function did not change after a transient worsening at T1. NT-proBNP, ST-2, and hs-TNI did not change as overall body fluids and quality of life assessed by KCCQ. NYHA class improved (p=0.002), paralleled by a decrease of MECKI (Metabolic Exercise test data combined with Cardiac and Kidney Indexes) score, from 3.3% (1.9–8.0) to 2.8% (1.2–5.7), suggestive of a positive impact on 2 years prognosis (p < 0.001). Conclusions Dapagliflozin induced positive LV remodeling, improvement of exercise ventilatory efficiency, and NYHA class but without peakVO2 fluid status and cardiac biomarkers changes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mapelli et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=75). Dapagliflozin vs. Baseline was evaluated on Peak oxygen intake (peakVO2) (p=0.297). Dapagliflozin treatment for 6 months in stable HFrEF patients improved left ventricular ejection fraction and ventilatory efficiency, but did not significantly improve peak oxygen intake (16.0 vs 16.2 mL/kg/min, p=0.297).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: