Key result
Cardiac biomarkers NT-proBNP and hsTnT discriminated 10-year heart failure risk better than the clinical ARIC HF model (C-index 0.73 vs 0.68, P=0.004) in adults with chronic kidney disease.
Why the study?
Heart failure is common in CKD, and identifying high-risk patients may guide clinical care, but the prognostic value of cardiac biomarkers and echocardiography compared with a clinical prediction equation remained unassessed.
Do cardiac biomarkers and echocardiographic variables improve 10-year prediction of incident heart failure compared to the ARIC HF prediction equation in patients with CKD?
Cohort (n=2,147)
Do cardiac biomarkers and echocardiographic variables improve 10-year prediction of incident heart failure compared to the ARIC HF prediction equation in patients with CKD?
Effect estimate: C-index 0.73
p-value: p=0.004
Measurement of NT-proBNP and hsTnT offers better discrimination for 10-year incident heart failure risk than the clinical ARIC HF model in adults with CKD.
NT-proBNP/hsTnT may aid 10-year HF risk stratification in CKD; leaves open need for tailored models and outcome trials.
Introduction Heart failure (HF) is common in chronic kidney disease (CKD); identifying patients with CKD at high risk for HF may guide clinical care. We assessed the prognostic value of cardiac biomarkers and echocardiographic variables for 10-year HF prediction compared with a published clinical HF prediction equation in a cohort of participants with CKD. Methods We studied 2147 Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) participants without prior HF with complete clinical, cardiac biomarker (N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP] and high sensitivity troponin-T [hsTnT]), and echocardiographic data (left ventricular mass [LVM] and left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] data). We compared the discrimination of the 11-variable Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) HF prediction equation with LVM, LVEF, hsTnT, and NT-proBNP to predict 10-year risk of hospitalization for HF using a Fine and Gray modeling approach. We separately evaluated prediction of HF with preserved and reduced LVEF (LVEF ≥50% and <50%, respectively). We assessed discrimination with internally valid C-indices using 10-fold cross-validation. Results Participants' mean (SD) age was 59 (11) years, 53% were men, 43% were Black, and mean (SD) estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 44 (16) ml/min per 1.73 m 2 . A total of 324 incident HF hospitalizations occurred during median (interquartile range) 10.0 (5.7–10.0) years of follow-up. The ARIC HF model with clinical variables had a C-index of 0.68. Echocardiographic variables predicted HF (C-index 0.70) comparably to the published ARIC HF model, while NT-proBNP and hsTnT together (C-index 0.73) had significantly better discrimination ( P = 0.004). A model including cardiac biomarkers, echocardiographic variables, and clinical variables had a C-index of 0.77. Discrimination of HF with preserved LVEF was lower than for HF with reduced LVEF for most models. Conclusion The ARIC HF prediction model for 10-year HF risk had modest discrimination among adults with CKD. NT-proBNP and hsTnT discriminated better than the ARIC HF model and at least as well as a model with echocardiographic variables. HF clinical prediction models tailored to adults with CKD are needed. Until then, measurement of NT-proBNP and hsTnT may be a low-burden approach to predicting HF in this population, as they offer moderate discrimination.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zelnick et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in chronic kidney disease (CKD) (n=2,147). Cardiac biomarkers (NT-proBNP and hsTnT) vs. ARIC HF prediction equation (clinical variables) was evaluated on 10-year risk of hospitalization for heart failure (C-index 0.73, p=0.004). Cardiac biomarkers NT-proBNP and hsTnT discriminated 10-year heart failure risk better than the clinical ARIC HF model (C-index 0.73 vs 0.68, P=0.004) in adults with chronic kidney disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: