Five different molecular glass chemically amplified photoresists which utilized different solubility switching mechanisms and chemistries, based on a tris(4-hydroxyphenyl)ethane (THPE) core, were synthesized and their performance compared. Three different positive tone systems were designed based on acid catalyzed deprotection of a phenolic hydroxyl group protected with one of the following groups: tert-butoxycarbonyl (tBoc), tetrahydropyranyl, or ethoxyethyl. Two negative tone systems were designed; one using cationic epoxide polymerization of pendant epoxides and one using condensation of the unprotected THPE with a multifunctional cross-linking additive. The tBoc system and negative tone systems showed good performance under deep UV and large field e-beam patterning, but the epoxide system showed far superior performance for high resolution electron beam patterning. It was able to produce 50nm 1:1 line/space patterns and 30nm lines on 1:3 line/space patterns with high sensitivity, good contrast, and a very low line edge roughness (3σ) of 2.3nm using 100keV electron beam patterning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lawson et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: