Reaction of 4,5-bis(methylsulfanyl)-1,3-dithiole-2-thione 1 with diiodine or iodine monobromide in CH2Cl2 resulted in the formation of molecular charge-transfer complexes 1·I2 and 1·IBr respectively. Both complexes have been characterised crystallographically and contain a linear S–I–X (X = I or Br) moiety with the sulfur adopting a tetrahedral geometry taking into account the stereochemically active lone pairs. The S–I [2.716(3)] and I–I [2.808(3) Å] bond lengths in 1·I2 are similar to those reported for diiodine complexes of related thione donors. The adduct 1·IBr is the first crystallographically characterised thione–iodine monobromide charge-transfer complex. The S–I distance [2.589(2) Å] is shorter than that in 1·I2, consistent with IBr being a stronger acceptor than I2. The I–Br distance [2.7138(11) Å] is lengthened with respect to that in unco-ordinated IBr, but within bonding distance when compared to the sum of the van der Waals radii for iodine and bromine (3.75 Å). Treatment of 1 with dibromine under identical conditions resulted in the formation of the adduct 1·Br2 and the dithiolylium salt [C5H6S4Br][Br3]·½Br2 2. Treatment of 1 with Br2 in toluene led to the isolation of 1·Br2 only. The crystal structure of 1·Br2 shows the compound to contain a linear Br–S–Br moiety with the sulfur in a T-shaped or Ψ-trigonal bipyramidal environment (taking into account the stereochemically active lone pairs). The structure of 2 reveals a three component system consisting of the [C5H6S4Br]+ cation, the [Br3]– anion and a molecule of Br2 in a 2∶2∶1 ratio. These components are held in the lattice by a series of weak intermolecular interactions which link the tribromide ions and dibromine molecules into zigzag chains.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bricklebank et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: