Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Summary Most of the Cu previously added to humic acid derived from a sedge fen peat was easily removed by washing with acid, but the strength of binding increased as the Cu content decreased. The capacity to retain firmly bound Cu was reduced to about half by treating the humic acid to block either carboxyl or hydroxyl groups alone or to block both groups together. The retaining sites blocked therefore probably involve both carboxyl and hydroxyl groups acting together, but alternatively could be groups such as hydroxy‐quinone, affected by both types of treatment. Retention of Cu by peat differs from retention by the extracted humic acid.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davies et al. (1969) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: