Key result
The A/G-VII emergency vaccine did not provide sufficient protection against the A/IRN/05 lineage of FMDV, yielding a heterologous potency of 2.0 PD50/dose (95% CI 0.4-6.0).
Why the study?
With the circulation of both A/G-VII and A/IRN/05 FMDV lineages in the Middle East, it was necessary to assess whether an A/G-VII emergency vaccine provides cross-protection against the A/IRN/05 lineage.
Effect estimate: Potency ratio 0.04 (95% CI 0.004-0.3)
A/G-VII vaccines provide inadequate cross-protection against co-circulating A/IRN/05; leaves open optimal multivalent strain selection for antigen banks.
The recent emergence and circulation of the A/ASIA/G-VII (A/G-VII) lineage of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) in the Middle East has resulted in the development of homologous vaccines to ensure susceptible animals are sufficiently protected against clinical disease. However, a second serotype A lineage called A/ASIA/Iran-05 (A/IRN/05) continues to circulate in the region and it is therefore imperative to ensure vaccine strains used will protect against both lineages. In addition, for FMDV vaccine banks that usually hold a limited number of strains, it is necessary to include strains with a broad antigenic coverage. To assess the cross protective ability of an A/G-VII emergency vaccine (formulated at 43 (95% CI 8–230) PD50/dose as determined during homologous challenge), we performed a heterologous potency test according to the European Pharmacopoeia design using a field isolate from the A/IRN/05 lineage as the challenge virus. The estimated heterologous potency in this study was 2.0 (95% CI 0.4–6.0) PD50/dose, which is below the minimum potency recommended by the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE). Furthermore, the cross-reactive antibody titres against the heterologous challenge virus were poor (≤log10 0.9), even in those cattle that had received the full dose of vaccine. The geometric mean r1-value was 0.2 (95% CI 0.03–0.8), similar to the potency ratio of 0.04 (95% CI 0.004–0.3). Vaccination decreased viraemia and virus excretion compared to the unvaccinated controls. Our results indicate that this A/G-VII vaccine does not provide sufficient protection against viruses belonging to the A/IRN/05 lineage and therefore the A/G-VII vaccine strain cannot replace the A/IRN/05 vaccine strain but could be considered an additional strain for use in vaccines and antigen banks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singanallur et al. (2022) studied Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV). A/G-VII emergency vaccine vs. Unvaccinated controls was evaluated on Heterologous potency against A/IRN/05 lineage (Potency ratio 0.04, 95% CI 0.004-0.3). The A/G-VII emergency vaccine did not provide sufficient protection against the A/IRN/05 lineage of FMDV, yielding a heterologous potency of 2.0 PD50/dose (95% CI 0.4-6.0).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: