Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Effects of propionate and ammonium on contractions produced by Na+ removal (0-Na+ contraction, replaced with N-methyl-D-glucamine) were studied and compared with those produced by 60 mM K+ in muscle strips isolated from human internal mammary artery (IMA) and saphenous vein (SV), clinically used as bypass vessels. Contractions induced by 60 mM K+ (60-K+ contractions) were similar in both vessels. 0-Na+ contraction was significantly larger in the vein than in the artery. Neither 60-K+ nor 0-Na+ contractions were significantly affected by NG-nitro-L-arginine (30 microM) or phenoxybenzamine (1 microM). Ouabain (2 microM) slowly potentiated 0-Na+ contractions and the 3rd contraction produced 60 min after ouabain application was 291 +/- 36% in the artery and 184 +/- 41% of the control (n = 10) in the vein. Propionate (20 mM) potentiated 60-K+ contraction more strongly in the vein than in the artery, but potentiation of 0-Na+ contraction was greater in the artery than in the vein. On the other hand, ammonium (20 mM) inhibited 60-K+ contractions more strongly in the artery than the vein, whereas inhibition of 0-Na+ contraction was stronger in the vein. 0-Na+ contraction is likely to be produced by an Na(+)-Ca2+ exchange mechanism, and the effects of propionate and ammonium are considered to be mediated by intracellular acidification and alkalinization, respectively. It is speculated that an Na(+)-H+ exchange may also be involved in 0-Na+ contraction and that SV has slightly lower pHi than IMA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miyahara et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: