A detailed study was undertaken of electron tunneling into amorphous Ge. At low temperature, T100 K, the high-field conductivity of the a-Ge film is similar to the tunneling conductance. For a-Ge thicknesses t500 {} the conductance of a-Ge blends smoothly with the tunneling conductance. This makes separation of tunneling conductance from the bulk a-Ge conductance difficult at low temperatures for junctions with thick a-Ge layers. The relation σ=σ₀exp[-(T₁T)1/4] holds well for these junctions at zero bias for temperatures not showing bulk a-Ge effects. In junctions with sufficiently thin a-Ge layers, t≈100 {}, the bulk a-Ge does not seriously modify the conductance away from zero bias. A series of junctions formed on the same oxide with t≤80 {} of a-Ge show an exponential drop in conductance with increasing t leveling off at temperature-dependent values. This is interpreted as incomplete surface coverage. This interpretation is independent of the details of the tunneling mechanism into a-Ge, but does place an upper limit on the possible tunneling range, varying from 28 {} at 300 K to 50 {} at 4.2 K. Tunneling thus only probes the surface layers of a-Ge and does not reflect the bulk properties. Capacitance studies of the junctions indicate the presence of a high density of interface states, Nₛ≥2.5×10¹⁴ eV^-1 cm^-2. Superconductive tunneling confirms that tunneling is the dominant conduction mode for these junctions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
J. W. Osmun (1975) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: