Key result
Short-axis in-plane continuous fascia iliaca compartment block showed no significant difference in 48-hour ropivacaine consumption compared to the long-axis technique for hip arthroplasty.
Why the study?
Continuous fascia iliaca compartment block provides effective analgesia after hip orthopedic surgeries, but the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided short-axis versus long-axis in-plane techniques required comparison.
Does a short-axis in-plane technique compared to a long-axis in-plane technique reduce ropivacaine consumption in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty?
RCT (n=26)
Double-blind
computer-generated randomization sequence
No
Does a short-axis in-plane technique compared to a long-axis in-plane technique reduce ropivacaine consumption in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty?
Short-axis and long-axis in-plane techniques for continuous fascia iliaca compartment block provide similar analgesic efficacy and ropivacaine consumption, though the short-axis approach requires slightly less procedural time.
May support continuous FICB for hip arthroplasty analgesia; leaves open optimal in-plane technique.
Continuous Fascia iliaca compartment block provides effective analgesia by effective blockade of the femoral and lateral femoral cutaneous (LFC) in patients undergoing hip orthopedic surgeries. We compared analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided continuous fascia iliaca compartment block using either a short-axis in-plane technique or a long-axis in-plane technique for patients undergoing hip arthroplasty.In this prospective double-blind study, twenty-six ASA- I and II patients undergoing hip orthopedic surgeries were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive continuous fascia iliaca compartment block with either a short axis in-plane or a long-axis in- plane technique. The perineural catheter was attached to an electronic infusion pump. Ropivacaine 0.2% was administered through the catheter for 48 hours (4 mL/h). The primary outcome was ropivacaine consumption within 48h in the two groups. Secondary outcomes included the procedural time, success rate of block, postoperative pain score evaluated by NRS score at rest and movement. There was no significant difference in the consumption of ropivacaine during the 48 postoperative hours (P>0.05). Short-axis in-plane group need less procedural time for catheterization insertion than long-axis group. Compared with the short-axis in-plane technique, long-axis in-plane continuous fasicia iliaca compartment block had no ropivacaine-sparing effect on patient-controlled analgesia for hip arthroplasty.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ebshena et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Hip arthroplasty (n=26). Short-axis in-plane continuous fascia iliaca compartment block vs. Long-axis in-plane continuous fascia iliaca compartment block was evaluated on 0.2% ropivacaine consumption during the 48 postoperative hours (p=>0.05). Short-axis in-plane continuous fascia iliaca compartment block showed no significant difference in 48-hour ropivacaine consumption compared to the long-axis technique for hip arthroplasty.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: