The structure of the natural mineral calcio-olivine (γ-Ca2SiO4) found in skarn xenoliths in the region of the Lakargi Mountain (North Caucasus, Kabardino-Balkaria, Russia) is refined by the Rietveld method [a = 5.07389(7) Å, b = 11.21128(14) Å, c = 6.75340(9) Å, V = 384.170(5) Å3, Z = 4, ρcalcd = 2.98 g/cm3, space group Pbnm]. The X-ray diffraction pattern of a powdered sample is recorded on a STOE STADI MP diffractometer [λCuK α1; Ge(111) primary monochromator; 6.00° < 2θ < 100.88°; step width, 2.5° in 2θ; number of reflections, 224]. All calculations are performed with the WYRIET (version 3.3) software package. The structural model is refined in the anisotropic approximation to R p = 6.44, R wp = 8.52, R exp = 5.85, R B = 4.98, R F = 6.90, and s = 1.46. It is shown that the sample under investigation is a mixture of several mineral phases, among which calcio-olivine (the natural analogue of the γ-Ca2SiO4 compound) (83%), hillebrandite (13%), and wadalite (4%) are dominant. Only the scale factors and the unit cell parameters are refined for hillebrandite Ca2SiO3(OH)2 [a = 3.63472(16) Å, b = 16.4140(10) Å, c = 11.7914(8) Å, space group Cmc21, Z = 6] and wadalite Ca6Al5Si2O16Cl3 (a = 12.0088 Å, space group, I 4 3d Z = 4). The results of the structure refinement of the main component of the sample confirm that the mineral calcio-olivine is isostructural to the synthetic compound γ-Ca2SiO4. The structure of this compound is formed by the heteropolyhedral framework composed of Ca octahedra joined together into olivine-like ribbons and isolated Si tetrahedra.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gobechiya et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: