The state of infrastructure in Canada is concerning, with many structures requiring rehabilitation or replacement in the near future. Researchers are investigating Fe-SMAs as a novel prestress strengthening system to address this need. The novel system provides a faster and more adaptable alternative to traditional methods. The straightforward and quicker installation system makes Fe-SMA feasible at any point in a structure's lifespan. The key to this system is its ability to self-prestress through the shape memory effect, developing recovery stress when restrained. This paper systematically reviews studies on the flexural strengthening of reinforced concrete (RC) beams using Fe-SMA, discussing the system’s performance, installation techniques (EB/EUB, NSM, CR), and long-term durability. It compares conventional prestress strengthening techniques and outlines key challenges and research directions. Findings suggest that Fe-SMA can effectively extend the service life of infrastructure by delaying deterioration while addressing the limitations of current methods. Fe-SMA offers advantages over traditional materials, such as steel and CFRP, including improved ductility, enhanced corrosion resistance, and cost-effectiveness. Its effectiveness has been demonstrated in real-life applications, such as the strengthening of a 113-year-old bridge, which showcases its potential for large-scale rehabilitation. Additionally, Fe-SMA offers environmental benefits, including ease of reintegration and the ability to be processed into new materials. The paper identifies challenges such as stress relaxation, non-uniform stress distribution during sequential activation, and the need for advanced anchorage systems. A notable feature is Fe-SMA's ability to recover stress losses through multiple activations, which requires standardized reactivation protocols. Future research should focus on quantitative cost and life-cycle analyses, as well as environmental impact assessments, to further validate the advantages of Fe-SMA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Forrest et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: