Key result
A new classification of PCOS phenotypes dividing each Rotterdam phenotype into obese or lean sub-phenotypes is proposed to better account for metabolic alterations linked to weight.
Proposes updating PCOS diagnostic criteria to include obesity/body weight to better stratify metabolic and cardiovascular risk.
The diagnosis of PCOS is based on the Rotterdam guidelines: chronic anovulation, hyperandrogenism (biologic or clinical) and polycystic ovaries on ultrasound. Two of these three criteria are sufficient for making diagnosis of PCOS. However, one characteristic that is often associated to PCOS (obesity with severe insulin resistance and metabolic alteration regarding glucose metabolism and lipid pattern) has remained out of the current classification of PCOS. Because of this, patients with different metabolic and cardiovascular risk may be included in the same phenotype, and it makes more difficult to establish clear strategies of follow-up and treatment of the patients with increased risks, and also may hide genetic or environmental differences between PCOS patients. Our recent study has shown that metabolic alterations are linked to the weight and not to the Rotterdam phenotypes. Because of this, we suggest a new classification of PCOS phenotypes that divides each Rotterdam phenotype in obese (ob) or lean (l) sub-phenotype. An improved classification of PCOS may be essential for permitting new progress in our understanding of pathogenesis and treatment of PCOS (or of the different disorders that are part of PCOS).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Enrico Carmina (2022) conducted an editorial in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS). Classification of PCOS phenotypes by weight (obese vs lean) vs. Current Rotterdam guidelines was evaluated. A new classification of PCOS phenotypes dividing each Rotterdam phenotype into obese or lean sub-phenotypes is proposed to better account for metabolic alterations linked to weight.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: